A SECRET CODE
SPJ is revising its Code of Ethics in a most unethical way.
I’m a three-term member of SPJ’s national board of directors. I recently learned this by accident…
Sometime in the next few weeks (I don’t know when), SPJ will pay up to $11,000 for a group of people (I don’t know how many) to spend several days (I don’t know the number) in Columbus, Ohio.
Those people (who the board of directors didn’t approve) will revise SPJ’s vaunted Code of Ethics. They’ll work off a first draft (written in secret by unknown authors) and submit their shiny new Code at SPJ’s annual convention in September – where 200 SPJers in attendance (out of 8,000 members) will endorse it in a single meeting at the end of the last day of the convention.
And then the SPJ Code of Ethics will officially change.
As a board member who knew none of this – and never voted on any of it – I complained. (It’s what I do best.)
The reply from SPJ’s senior leaders? Sorry, pal, that’s the way we’ve always done things.
Which is true. SPJ’s rules are literally 100 years old. They predate not only the Internet but also commercial radio.
(SPJ was founded in 1909, before refrigerators and zippers and crossword puzzles and women being allowed to vote.)
So I want to change SPJ’s rules before we change its Code of Ethics. Not surprisingly, SPJ leaders have told me I’m being “melodramatic.” You decide…
SPJ doesn’t want to hear it.
I asked SPJ’s president and his inner circle why the board of directors didn’t get to vote on – and wasn’t even informed of – the $11,000 meeting of the so-called Ethics Committee “working group” we didn’t know about.
The answer: It was a “management decision.”
So who decided that? Apparently, I did.
Without a hint of doubt or irony, and totally on the record, a senior SPJ leader told me I couldn’t complain – because I had approved the organization’s entire fiscal year budget…
“By voting to approve the budget, you lost the right to say the board did not have a say.”
…which, by the way, didn’t contain a line item for this $11,000 meeting. SPJ’s executive director admitted to me, “This wasn’t budgeted.”
But SPJ wasn’t budging. This is happening, SPJ top leaders tell me, and there’s nothing I can do about it.
So here’s what I’m doing about it…
I’m going to lead a probably futile attempt to convince SPJ’s delegates to oppose whatever this “working group” comes up with in Columbus.
Then I’ll ask those delegates to do two things…
1. Start over again, and do it openly
This $11,000 meeting is just the latest episode in a ridiculously secretive process I graphically illustrated in April. Coincidentally, ONA and SPJ are both working on ethics codes. But they’re going in opposite directions.
2. Vote to let everyone else vote
SPJ’s arcane rules only allow delegates to vote on changes to the Code of Ethics. These delegates are appointed according to century-old bylaws and represent a fraction of SPJ’s membership. Before the Internet and even fax machines, this was the only way to efficiently conduct business. In this century, all SPJ members should vote on a new code.
Times have changed – that’s why SPJ says it wants to update its code. But how silly is it to modernize a Code of Ethics using 100-year-old rules?
Email me if you want to join my quest or complain about it.
Defending the First Amendment and promoting open government are more crucial now than ever. Join SPJ's fight for the publics right to know either as an SPJ Supporter or a professional, student or retired journalist.