Schick hits the fan
If only they were all this quick and easy.
I described how Olens was demanding Schick erase four pages of very public records from his personal blog. Last week, Olens filed a motion with a judge to force the 28-year-old to comply.
Yesterday, Olens withdrew that motion.
Why? Who knows.
I’d like to think it had something to do with SPJers posting those same public records on their own blogs in protest. Not ony did I do that, but so did SPJ President Dave Cuillier.
At least one attorney is convinced SPJ had something to do with it.
“Whenever there’s a blogger whose rights are being threatened, SPJ is the first to ride to the rescue,” says Frank LoMonte, executive director of the Student Press Law Center. “There’s no question this needless intimidation tactic would have dragged on for many more weeks without SPJ’s timely intervention. The attorney general’s office thought they could push around one little student blogger, but they didn’t realize they were taking on an entire profession.”
As for Schick, he’s happy yet confused: “I’m very glad the Attorney General’s office withdrew their motion, but I still don’t know the reason why.”
It’d be great if the AG’s office withdrew the motion because they realized it was legally unsupportable in the first place. But if they just withdrew it because they now realize — in the age of the Internet — it would be impossible to track down everyone who might already have republished this material, that’s less encouraging.
I disgaree with Schick. I doubt Sam Olens jumped out of bed yesterday morning and blurted, “My God, what have I done?!” before rushing to work and withdrawing his motion. He’s an elected official who saw some bad publicity barreling towards him, so he smartly got out of the way. I find that very encouraging.
Defending the First Amendment and promoting open government are more crucial now than ever. Join SPJ's fight for the publics right to know either as an SPJ Supporter or a professional, student or retired journalist.