<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China&#8217;s News Broadcaster and a Thesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/jed/2011/12/09/chinas-news-broadcaster-and-a-thesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/jed/2011/12/09/chinas-news-broadcaster-and-a-thesis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 06:19:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Synclair</title>
		<link>http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/jed/2011/12/09/chinas-news-broadcaster-and-a-thesis/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Synclair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/jed/?p=125#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there truly a dilemma? There should be past research in databases about CCTV censorship that the student could have cited in his historical analysis and, therefore, not be held accountable for establishing his own observations; however, why must the thesis have historical reflection about censorship when the issue is audience analysis? For example in the Asian Journal of Communication, Elaine Yuan &#039;s research titled &quot;Measuring diversity of exposure in Guangzhou’s television market&quot; (2008, vol.18 issue 2) provides incredible quantitative research about audience analysis and does not venture toward censorship.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there truly a dilemma? There should be past research in databases about CCTV censorship that the student could have cited in his historical analysis and, therefore, not be held accountable for establishing his own observations; however, why must the thesis have historical reflection about censorship when the issue is audience analysis? For example in the Asian Journal of Communication, Elaine Yuan &#8216;s research titled &#8220;Measuring diversity of exposure in Guangzhou’s television market&#8221; (2008, vol.18 issue 2) provides incredible quantitative research about audience analysis and does not venture toward censorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
