Archive for August, 2011

Safety First, Story Second

By Lynn Walsh | August 22nd, 2011

By: Jacqueline A. Ingles

I didn’t get into reporting to have the typical 9-5 day. There have been many instances at work where I put my safety second and getting the best shot or best sound for a package first.

Last year, I got a second degree burn on my thigh while reporting. I was sidelined for a few days but rolled into work bandaged up and ready to shoot three days later. It was painful. Lugging a camera
and tripod with huge blisters on my thigh was misery. I barreled through. It has been 18 months and the scar on my leg is permanent. I call it an MPJ battle scar. Still, at 27-years-old it is something I wish I did not have. I should have learned my lesson there, but I didn’t and it almost cost me.

Ingles standing next to a water marker demonstrating the severe drought in Texas.

(more…)

Does your title matter?

By Lynn Walsh | August 17th, 2011

By: Lynn Walsh

Are you a multimedia journalist or a video journalist? Or are you a multimedia producer? Or maybe you consider yourself a digital journalist?

As the technology in the newsroom continues to change, the responsibilities of each person in the newsroom is also changing.

A reporter may now also be considered a photographer, an editor, a web producer, etc. More and more of us do more than just write stories or make the phone calls and do the research for the stories. We are also responsible for taking the pictures, shooting video, creating an online story and more, all while still reporting.

So, what does that mean for you? What do you list your title as on social media sites, your business cards, etc.?

These questions have been raised several times at conferences and during discussions with journalists and it made me think, does the title you use matter? Specifically, does it matter while you are applying for jobs?

After raising those questions to several people who are currently in hiring position or have been in the past, the consensus was that the title you are using is not as important as the work you are doing.

“Titles never meant anything to me,” Julie Lane said. She said, she wants to know “what experience a candidate had and how adept was that person in handling his or her responsibilities.” Lane is not currently in a position to hire journalists, she said, but has been in the past.

“The days of pigeon-holing someone into an ‘XYZ’ title are gone,” Patricia Edwards, an editor and publisher in North Carolina said. “In this day and age, the title ‘journalist’ encompasses so much more than it did when I got into the business. I am a journalist by profession but have worked as a reporter, photographer, editor, publisher. And given the current trend in reporting the news, you really have to be a ‘Jane of All Trades,’” she said.

The need to be a “Jane (or Jack) of all Trades,” is what journalism schools are preparing us to be and it is why, I think, we wonder what to call ourselves.

“I do think in today’s market, having experience that goes beyond one medium is important,” Lane said. “You may be a newspaper reporter, but are likely expected to write for the paper’s website and to provide still photography, video clips and slide shows for the web.”

So, when you have all of that experience and you want to market yourself accordingly, what title do you use? I posed this question to members of the Generation J committee.

“Newscast Producer,” committee member Mike Brannen said. Brannen works at a television station in Seattle, Washington where he produces the station’s morning newscast. “We have web editors, and by title I would call our reporters our journalists (even though producers take part),” he wrote in an e-mail.

Nathaniel Miller, also a Generation J committee member, lists himself as an “online content developer,” on business cards. “It’s the official title here,” he said. Miller works at the Sacramento Bee newspaper in California.

“Although, I’m a producer,” he said and “overall, it’s best to describe myself as an editor. That’s a technically correct answer, considering I’m the online editor on Sundays. But it’s not entirely correct. Web producer with editor responsibilities is probably the most exact.”

“I think now the definition of ‘(Title) Journalist’ is applicable to the folks utilizing social media more than the ones on the traditional platforms,” Brannen said.

For employers, Miller said he would also use the title “editor” because “that would grab their attention.”

I list my title as an “investigative multimedia journalist.” For me, I have decided to add “investigative” because it shows a niche or area of news that I am experienced in. That said, I would probably drop the word if I was applying to a general assignment reporter position.

I chose “multimedia” over “digital” or “video” because I like and want to continue to do more than just video editing and I think the word “multimedia” encompasses more of my skills than “digital.” But, I think those two words may be more interchangeable, than others.

Bob Beyette, a longtime reporter and news manager in Athens, Ohio believes the word “multimedia” says a reporter does more. “‘Digital’ says to me that they only work on the Internet,” he said. Beyette is also a professor at Ohio University.

As for choosing ‘journalist’ over ‘reporter,’ I again believe it encompasses more. I want people to see my title and think that I do more than report, which we probably all do and it may be assumed, but I think by saying ‘journalist’ I am telling people that I want to continue to be a reporter, a producer, an editor, etc. I don’t just want to produce or just report, I want to do a little bit of both.

“I wouldn’t put ‘radio’ reporter on my business card, so I don’t think I would put ‘multimedia’ or ‘digital’ on that,” Beyette said. For Beyette, the most important word is ‘reporter.’

What’s your title? Do you think it matters? I would love to hear from you, Lynn.K.Walsh@gmail.com or on Twitter, @LWalsh or @SPJGenerationJ.

I would also challenge you to ask someone, why they chose to use the title they did the next time you come across one that is different than yours. I think you will learn something new and who knows it may lead to more questions about your own title!

Lynn Walsh is an investigative multimedia journalist and the head of the SPJ Generation J committee. Get in touch with her on Twitter @LWalsh or Lynn.K.Walsh@gmail.com

My list of words that need to die in TV news

By Lynn Walsh | August 12th, 2011

By: Mike Brannen

The English language never has enough words for newscast producers. Stories written for air must be conversational, i.e., simplified for the audience. This eliminates about 90% of words you’d find in a dictionary. Even within a seemingly small range of choices, I insist several words should never appear again in a newscast.

Most well-trained producers know to avoid police terminology (lacerations=cuts, fled=ran) and maximize word use (It happened at= It was at). But, we can make broadcast copy even stronger and more impactful. I challenge producers to go a step further and disregard the following words because they are overused, weak, and used as a crutch to finish a script.

Big/Huge/Major

“The big announcement we’re waiting to hear from Company X.”

The announcement itself isn’t going to be big. It’s probably the information that will be learned. Either way, producers add in a word like this to add weight to a rather boring statement.

“The announcement we’re waiting to hear from Company X.”

Snooze. Listen to copy from newscasts, and see how pathetic teases and headlines are when “big,” “huge,” and “major” are removed. A simple re-write, and you get: “What Company X is announcing about its (blank).” Maybe not a killer headline, but it’s more specific, and doesn’t require much more effort to create.

Bombshell

By my definition, this word gets tossed around too often. I started to dislike it when the Arnold Schwarzenegger affair was revealed. I like to think a “bombshell” development must be extraordinarily wild, almost to unfathomable measures. It’s not like the fact that Arnold was having an affair was unimaginable.

I reached my breaking point when Casey Anthony was found not guilty. People were shocked. “The bombshell verdict” stations said. I was convinced beforehand she wouldn’t be found guilty because of the evidence (though I’m not certain of her innocence).

Again, this is all about applying the word in a context that doesn’t match. I’m not big on using “juicy” words to spice up copy. I’d rather rewrite something to entice a viewer and not wear them down on superficial words. I will admit I get turned off by a word like this if all the networks use it in the same story. No one stands out.

Recently, the only story I would deem “bombshell” is (deleted perhaps) the killing of Osama bin Laden, and really only on the day of and the day after. That’s the degree of “whoa” factor I expect for “bombshell.” (Side note for all iNews users: that’s the only day in the AP wires in four years I’ve had a “red” breaking alert versus the usual “orange” breaking alerts).

Just

There are two variations of this.

“Just minutes ago.”

Specify. (deleted it) Ten minutes ago. An hour ago. Let the audience know exactly when something happened.

“Just yesterday.” “You’ll remember just months back.”

Time referencing is subjective. It may be “just” months ago for the producer, but maybe a long time back for the viewer. Here, it also has no additional value to the sentence. Get rid of just and say “yesterday” or “you’ll remember months back.”

Very

In EVERY instance, you can lose “very.”

“Very loud.” “Very exciting.” “Very sad.” “Very happy.”

It was loud. It was exciting. He was sad. She was happy. “Very” weakens the sentence and takes attention away from the key sticking point of the sentence.

Adverbs hurt your most powerful words in the sentence, and the ones that make people get a response from your newscast. “Very” is like “big,” writers add it to make stories appear more newsworthy than they actually are.

Emotional/Dramatic

I’m guilty of using these words from time to time since either one encompasses as (is this supposed to be “a range”) range of emotion. Vigils for the Norway attacks are sad, but also full of hope and peace.

“Emotional” I think has the largest grey area, and I think is acceptable when used properly, and not as a crutch for lazy writing.

“Dramatic” is also a buzzword to hype up a story with maybe one juicy detail. Specify what’s the drama in the story, such as “Intense confrontation,” “heated argument,” or “passionate plea.”

One story, one headline, one tease at a time, you can police yourself to get “tease words” out of your newscast. Just for fun, mix these bad words together, and you get maybe the worst sentence ever written for TV:

The very big emotional bombshell just yesterday.
OR
A very huge dramatic bombshell just hours ago.
Yuck.

Mike Brannen is a morning newscast producer for KIRO7, the CBS affiliate in Seattle. He recently received a Master’s Degree from the University of Missouri-Columbia and completed his thesis, Motivational Use of Twitter. He previously worked multiple positions at KOMU-TV in Columbia, Missouri during the past four years.

Search the Blog

Use the form below to search the site:

First Draft is powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)

Blogroll