<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOI Links: The SEC&#8217;s surprise exemption</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/foi/2010/07/29/foi-links-the-secs-surprise-exemption/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/foi/2010/07/29/foi-links-the-secs-surprise-exemption/</link>
	<description>Freedom of Information, Freedom of the Press, and the Public&#039;s Right to Know</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Dudash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/foi/2010/07/29/foi-links-the-secs-surprise-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>April Dudash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/foi/?p=996#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points, Hal. Time will allow us to pinpoint the extreme gray areas of this exemption and how the SEC will use these to its benefit. I can only hope watchdog journalists continue to make requests to the SEC and challenge the reasons why they withhold information under this wide-ranging exemption.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, Hal. Time will allow us to pinpoint the extreme gray areas of this exemption and how the SEC will use these to its benefit. I can only hope watchdog journalists continue to make requests to the SEC and challenge the reasons why they withhold information under this wide-ranging exemption.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal (GT)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/foi/2010/07/29/foi-links-the-secs-surprise-exemption/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal (GT)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.spjnetwork.org/foi/?p=996#comment-72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll find out more of what this all means as time progresses. I guess the SEC is saying the law only clarifies a law that is currently in play when it comes to insider trade secrets. But my question to that is, why does it need clarification?

What&#039;s more, can they really be trusted to be honest?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll find out more of what this all means as time progresses. I guess the SEC is saying the law only clarifies a law that is currently in play when it comes to insider trade secrets. But my question to that is, why does it need clarification?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, can they really be trusted to be honest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
