Troubled Times in Sierra Leone
(Editor’s note: I spent a week in Sierra Leone at the request of the U.S. Department of State working with more than 150 journalists from the Sierra Leone Association of Journalists, the SL Editors’ Guide and the Independent Media Council to improve ethics and free press rights. I also assisted them with a number of association management issues.)
The question was a fair one.
“What do you see as the future for journalism in Sierra Leone, maybe in the next five years?” radio journalist Matthew Kanu asked as I mopped the sweat from my brow for the umpteenth time that oppressively hot day.
I gave a positive answer to the thousands of people listening in on the five Radio Maria Catholic stations carrying my live interview.
The real question is what will Matthew and other journalists make of their opportunities in this time? It doesn’t matter what I think, if I’m right or wrong. All that matters is what people here, journalists up front, work to accomplish in a country desperately seeking solutions to many obstacles holding back a free press and free speech.
For starters, imagine a law that can not only hold a journalist criminally responsible for an allegedly libelous statement but also hold citizens to those expectations for simply reading or listening to those words. A paper calls the president a rat. The reporter is jailed for libeling him, detained 10 days. You think, too bad for the journalist. That same law applies to any citizen who writes or speaks ill of another. And, if you are one of the many people who are seen reading that rat reference, then you could be arrested and charged with sedition, extending the defamation into the public sphere.
The people here think so as well. In fact, the United Nations and the U.S. government have told the Sierra Leone officials time and again that this isn’t an acceptable law in a democracy. They don’t seem to care.
“What if every paper said the same thing and then a large crowd marched to the jail, a thousand strong, and demanded to be jailed for reading something like that?” I asked, trying to make my point for solidarity.
Without a hesitation the response from many in the room was, “They would find space in the jail for a thousand people to prove their point.”
While here I’ve been diplomatic at times but outspoken often. I don’t think journalists should be going to jail for such nonsense. I don’t think any governance that claims to be a democracy should entertain such a law, let alone use it. I don’t think high-ranking government officials or mining companies should own newspapers. I think 63 newspapers in this tiny country are too many. I think too many journalists lack ethical standards, taking “brown envelopes” of money to write or not write certain stories. I think making up sources and facts in a paper and slanting every story for a political party is a terrible way to foster a responsible press. I think all of this and said so as often as I could when I held a microphone.
Part of the problem is that journalists need a solid remake of their ethics. In some cases, just a little understanding would go a long way. Bribes are common here. Journalists take them because many of them work for little or no money. High-ranking government officials own newspapers. The current and last two Ministers of Information all own newspapers. That they are barely profitable is of little interest to them so long as they exist to promote the party lines. Mining companies own papers and turn them into mouthpieces for their agendas. In fact, with 63 newspapers in a nation with a 35 percent literacy rate, many exist for no other reason than to promote political views and agendas. Many are difficult to read and understand and stories come off as glowing public relation releases.
The SLAJ understands that. They want to toughen the standards for journalists, starting with who can be one. Not advisable in my opinion, but understandable given they all get punished by the ethical police that is the central government. In fact, while I was there members were trying to address government suggestions that if journalists were more ethical, perhaps the government would be less likely to impose its criminal libel laws on them
I walked them through SPJ’s Code of Ethics and they adopted our four guiding principles and borrowed from our tenets. Much of what they shared with me has been in their Code of Conduct for more than 10 years. It’s not a lawless journalistic society, just one with more and more untrained journalists entering the fray and behaving poorly. It’s common for stories to be made up, for example. Most responsible journalists, like those who belong to SLAJ and the Editors’ Guide also support the IMC’s code which is more than 20 pages long.
But it’s not up to me to right these issues. I can advise, and I did a lot of that this week, drawing on my experience in ethics, media law and media association management. I appealed to their ethics, which many have, and I reached them with reason. Matthew Kanu and his colleagues with the Sierra Leone Association of Journalists are strong, principled people who want a better country with a responsible press and the choke of an oppressive government away from its neck.
Five years can be a long time under these conditions. My hope is that Matthew and many like him can make a difference. I know they will try. And, for my continuing part, I will support them any way I can.
Unfettered access to those in power, a push for government transparency and a vigorous defense of the First Amendment are perhaps more important now than ever before. Join us as we fight for the public’s right to know as an SPJ Supporter. Or, if you’re a journalist, we welcome you to stand with us as a Professional, Student or Retired Member.