Coverage of Palestinian crisis seems biased

From a diversity standpoint, the coverage of the problems facing the Palestinians seems biased against them.

President Bush has repeatedly said he wants to bring “democracy” to the Middle East, but only a democracy that supports his view of politics there.

When the Palestinians, in a free and open election, chose Hamas over the Fatah-led candidates, Mr. Bush didn’t like that and opposed the results. In other words, he supports democratic elections as long as the results are what he wants.

And, news coverage tends to support the president.

How is it that the United States and Israel can decide who is to govern the Palestinians. Today, June 21st, the New York Times News Service and AP reported that both agreed to declare President Mahmoud Abbas “the president of all Palestinians.”

Isn’t that dictatorial, and the opposite of a democracy?

And, isn’t the mainstream media feeding into it?

Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on TumblrPin on PinterestShare on Reddit


Newest Posts

What do communities say about SPJ’s future? January 23, 2015, 8:54 pm
OU ready for your RSVP January 20, 2015, 5:39 pm
Tamara Keith on social political journalism January 15, 2015, 5:19 pm
Kansas State University’s SPJ chapter bolsters membership one year after relaunching January 13, 2015, 4:24 pm
Discussing Violence with our Journalism Students January 12, 2015, 10:24 pm
Alex Veeneman is SPJ’s volunteer of the month January 11, 2015, 9:13 pm
Press freedom orgs react to massacre of journalists in Paris January 7, 2015, 6:56 pm

Copyright © 2007-2015 Society of Professional Journalists. All Rights Reserved. Legal

Society of Professional Journalists
Eugene S. Pulliam National Journalism Center, 3909 N. Meridian St., Indianapolis, IN 46208
317/927-8000 | Fax: 317/920-4789 | Contact SPJ Headquarters | Employment Opportunities | Advertise with SPJ